Woman knows a man’s intention when he touches her, says Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court made this statement while suspending the sentence of a convict in the case of molestation of a former actor.
A woman may know less but she understands more and knows the intention when a man touches her or even looks at her, the Bombay High Court said while suspending the sentence of a convict in the case of molestation of a former actor.
Justice Prithviraj Chavan was hearing an appeal filed by a 41-year-old businessman Vikas Sachdev, convicted for molesting the former actor on board a domestic flight in December 2017.
The court on Tuesday admitted Sachdev’s appeal and suspended his sentence till the appeal is heard and decided.
ALSO WATCH | ‘Men took seven steps back after MeToo India’: Kajol during Devi promotions
A sessions court here on January 15, 2020 convicted Sachdev under IPC Section 354 (assault or criminal force on woman with an intent to outrage her modesty) and provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, as the victim was a minor when the incident took place.
He was awarded three years’ imprisonment in the case.
The sessions court had on the same day granted bail to Sachdev and suspended the sentence imposed upon him for a period of three months.
On February 20, the businessman filed an appeal before the high court, claiming that the trial court erred in finding him guilty.
Sachdev’s lawyer Aniket Nikam told the high court on Tuesday that his client has been wrongly convicted and even if his leg had touched the victim, it must have been a mistake and without any intention to harass her.
Justice Chavan, however, asked why Sachdev had to keep his leg on the arm rest of the seat ahead of him.
“A woman may know less but she understands more. It is a natural gift...touch...look...a man will not understand but a woman knows the intention behind these,” the judge said.
It is only the victim who can talk about the accused person’s mens rea (intention), the judge said, adding the accused will never admit that he touched intentionally.
“You (Sachdev) were travelling in business class where you have lot of space, then why keep your leg on someone else’s arm rest?” the judge asked.
When Nikam argued that the victim did not complain to the flight crew members and walked out of the flight smiling, the court said there is no formula on how a woman should behave or react to such incidents.
“This is not mathematics. There is no straitjacket formula on how a woman would behave or react when faced with such a situation,” the court said.
Justice Chavan said there will hardly be any woman who has not experienced such incidents in local train and buses.
The bench admitted Sachdev’s appeal and suspended his sentence till the appeal is heard and disposed of.
“There is no scope of the appeal being heard and decided in the near future and since the sentence imposed on the applicant (Sachdev) is short, the sentence stands suspended,” the court said.
The court directed Sachdev to submit a fresh bail bond of Rs 25,000 and to not leave Mumbai without prior permission from the sessions court.
Nikam also argued that there were contradictions between statements given by the victim and other eyewitnesses.
“The crew members of the flight had deposed that the accused was sleeping throughout the flight,” he argued.
The incident took place when the victim, then 17 years old, was travelling by an Air Vistara flight from Delhi to Mumbai.
After landing, the victim narrated the ordeal through a video post on Instagram.
Sachdev was subsequently arrested and later released on bail.